Act Tax Act

19 April 2012
Comments Off

Tax Act HUGE Tax Refund

The Tax Act gives the potential for a HUGE tax refund but you have to act tax.  Act Tax?  Sure.  Look at the tax act slightly askew from how the tax agents and the taxing government want you to see it.

Act Tax RefundInvest Tax Refund in SUCCESS

According to the tax act, a taxpayer has to report all taxable income.  So for a huge tax refund, simply write zero as your taxable income regardless of what amount of net income you actually earned.  Don’t volunteer to be a taxpayer by automatically calling your own income taxable.

Act Tax Refund

Will not complying with the heinous tax act get you a huge tax refund?  Maybe!  Or the nasty tax bureaucrats may think of some underhanded way to steal your tax refund but I think it is at least worth the tax protest.  And maybe one day enough of us can voice our tax displeasure and get the income tax system abolished.  Wouldn’t that be a huge tax refund for all of us and a wonderful day for mankind.

Elections Really are a Farce

13 May 2012
Comments Off

I received the following email from Elections Canada.  They had vital questions that they needed answers presumably for the sake of Canada’s national security and for the integrity of the whole system.

My name is (deleted) and I am the auditor with Elections Canada that is assigned to review your campaign return. I am writing to request your assistance in providing additional information needed to complete my review. Please find below the list of questions.
1. The campaign bank account had zero (0) balance as at August 17, 2011. Please confirm if the account was closed on that day.
2.  Elections Canada mailed the $1,000 nomination deposit refund to you on November 7, 2011. Did you receive it? If so, what did you do with the cheque?
3.  The external auditor billed the campaign $577.50. Elections Canada will provide audit subsidy of $250.00 directly to the auditor. Please advise if the candidate will be paying for the remaining balance of $327.50.
4.  Please confirm that the candidate did not incur any incremental personal expenses as a result of this election.
5.  Please confirm if a receipt was issued to the candidate for the $200.00 monetary contribution.
6.  Please confirm that no signs were used for the election.
7.  Did the candidate have a website during the election?  If yes, what was the website address and who paid the expenses related to website development?
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.Sincerely, (deleted bureaucrat’s name to save them the shame of being known as a bureaucrat)
Act Tax Refund
Here are my answers – in bold:
The campaign bank account had zero (0) balance as at August 17, 2011. Please confirm if the account was closed on that day.
Yes The account was closed. 
Elections Canada mailed the $1,000 nomination deposit refund to you on November 7, 2011. Did you receive it? If so, what did you do with the cheque?
Obviously, I cashed it.  Why do you have to ask me this?  Can’t you look at your own bank account and see the cancelled cheque?  Do you need to know what I spent the refunded $1000 on too?
The external auditor billed the campaign $577.50. Elections Canada will provide audit subsidy of $250.00 directly to the auditor. Please advise if the candidate will be paying for the remaining balance of $327.50.
I am on the hook for that extra money because of the incompetence of elections Canada.  YOU approved my first auditor then changed your minds after the fact.
Please confirm that the candidate did not incur any incremental personal expenses as a result of this election.
I ran my campaign, such as it was, without accepting any bribes. I suppose you can’t understand that.  Should we count the $327.50 from your above question as a personal expense?
Please confirm if a receipt was issued to the candidate for the $200.00 monetary contribution.
No receipts at all were issues because no dirty bribe money was accepted.
Please confirm that no signs were used for the electionNo signs were used.
Did the candidate have a website during the election?  If yes, what was the website address and who paid the expenses related to website development?
Yes.  http://xtax.ca  I listed the domain and hosting expense on my campaign return.  There were no other expenses because I did my own website development.  Setting up a wordpress blog isn’t all that difficult.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
I have many questions but I doubt I’ll ever get any true answers from the government.
Russ Toews
PS.  My condolences that you work for a criminal organization.

PPS  – I want to add this to my answer to your question # 3

The external auditor billed the campaign $577.50. Elections Canada will provide audit subsidy of $250.00 directly to the auditor. Please advise if the candidate will be paying for the remaining balance of $327.50.

Your Elections Canada returning officer approved my appointment of an auditor, even though your Elections Canada returning officer knew that my auditor was also the official agent for a party candidate.  That auditor was willing to perform the required audit for only the $250 subsidy.  After the campaign, my auditor was excluded from being my auditor.  So why was he not excluded from being the local party’s official agent instead or also?  The obvious answer is that the elections act was enacted by a party government that wanted to ensure that party candidates always win-and that bias shows in every facet of the disgusting elections act and the application.

The true fact is that the political party system is expressly designed to facilitate corruption.  Let’s boil the party system down to the root premise – The wealthy pay money to a party politician’s campaign so that when elected, the party politician can enact legislation that unfairly favors the wealthy contributors.  Call it whatever you like, but I name it for what it actually is – corruption.

The nation and humanity as a whole would be much better off as an actual democracy than the party dictatorships that falsely term themselves as democracies.

By the way, the $327.50 your unfairly applying a paltry rule cost me amounted to more than one and a half times the dollar value of what my entire campaign cost.  How does that look for you in perspective?

Like I said in the post title – Elections Really are a Farce!

The Nation’s Most Notorious Theif Steals Once Again

12 August 2011
Comments Off

My $207.00 Political Campaign is all set to leap to $1207.00 when the Government steals my $1000.00 deposit.

Try Your Hand at Success!  Click Here

Honestly, back when I submitted my nomination papers, I had a niggling suspicion that I would never see my $1000 candidate deposit again. When the sticky fingered government touches money, it does not want to ever give it back. And so I mentally wrote the money off as soon as I handed it over with my nomination package.

What is TaxIn these last few days before the deadline for filing an audited candidate’s election return, Elections Canada has disqualified my official auditor. The reason is that my auditor was also involved in the election as an official agent for the NDP party. This was not a secret: the Election Returning Officer was fully aware of the dual status of auditor/official agent for another party and he was confirmed as my official auditor. The dual role was fine when Elections Canada was accepting the money but now that they are faced with the horrifying prospect of having to give the money back, suddenly it is an unacceptable breach of the elections act.

Even though my official agent and I have filled out all the required forms to account for every penny of my $207 campaign expenditures, they will be denied because I now do not have an official auditor to perform the crucial audit. The bottom line is that Elections Canada will get to keep my $1000 candidate deposit.

The government is sleazy: we all know that. Government cares almost exclusively about money: we hold our noses and try to divert our minds from it. I really don’t care about my $1000.00 deposit: I’m not motivated by money like the government is. BUT, I will say this: government is NOT going to change until WE change it.

I ran in the last election even though I knew that the system is rigged to ensure that parties always win. I’ll run in the next election too, despite having had my deposit stolen in this one because I have unshakable optimism. I know that with only some small and painless modifications in the fundamentals of government it could be made into something that isn’t sleazy and rotten to the core – as it is now. But again I’ll say – WE have to do it because THEY won’t.

Sane System of Public Revenue

6 May 2011
Comments Off

We need to put tax reform onto the big agenda


What is Tax? Tax is a crime against citizens.

Only a Tiny Change for a HUGE Reform

What is TaxConverting the monstrous income tax system to an employment tax might sound like a monumental task but it is absolutely simple. The only real change is in the basic premise. The rest of the necessary apparatus is already in place and it would only need minor touches to be retooled for the new job. Certainly the whole reform wouldn’t take any more time and money that is spent every time a party promise changes the tax system at a new budget.

Income Tax ‘Loves’ Like an Abusive Spouse

Government does not love you: it loves your money. And when you allow the government to abuse you in one critical way, then it takes advantage to hurt us in more ways too. Make a stand and say NO! We can easily end the abomination of income tax and that alone will have a huge benefit to all of our lives.

Can you examine your world and situation critically to understand what is wrong with our lives? Do you dare to even try? Most of us know there are many problems but we close our minds to them: we prefer focusing on the things which are good. But that.doesn’t fix or even address the problematic issues: those are just piling up and growing worse. Our current situation created these problems and to repair them, we have to make changes.  But we can do so easily and painlessly.

No Right is Still No Right

Government Only Loves Money

You as an individual do not have the right to take money from your neighbor’s pay to use as you want – even if you spend it on what you say is in the neighborhood’s best interest. And the people of Canada similarly do not posses that right collectively either because what is not a right for one is not a right for millions of ones either – even when acting as a community. Government only has the power to inflict laws that profess to create the delusion of a right from a wrong.  But the real and true bottom line is that income tax is founded on an untrue principle that can never be righted, no matter how many judges try to bolster their employer’s case with legal baffle.  So if it can never be actually legitimized, why should we let it stand?  The answer is that we should not and we need not either.

The government does not have the right to tax people but we as citizens do have the right to tax business.  Regardless of who might own any particular business, all corporate and company entities were created from our laws: they are slaves to our prosperity and we can tax them.  An employment tax could replace the income tax so smoothly that the change would be almost unnoticeable – but the actual effect would be absolutely amazing.  Our whole national situation would instantly improve and the longer term results would keep getting better and better.

To close this article, I’ll say that your lives might seem comfortable for now but that the breeze of change is gathering momentum. We can wait and see where we will be blown or we can set a sail to steer where we want. Ever since 911, the police state we are living in has deepened but crime and violence is increasing despite (or more likely because of) the more intense oppression. In addition to the other many benefits, an improved tax system will reduce the tension in our society and the crimes born in that tension will also drastically decrease.

What is Tax?  It is a problem to be eradicated.



Next Page »